
Undertake annual monitoring and review in a transparent and inclusive manner as part of the local authority annual monitoring reporting for local development frameworks, corporate financial reporting process or facility operator’s performance monitoring.
Monitoring and review should answer the following key questions:
Reporting on Planning Obligations
Monitoring the delivery of planning obligations is particularly poor across local authorities, in particular where there isn’t a dedicated Section 106 officer. Last year, Cushman & Wakefield found £1.25 billion of unspent developer contributions. Annual reporting should consider keeping a database to allow local authorities to monitor:
Reporting on Community Priorities
The annual reporting should consider whether policies or schemes have contributed to the achievement of local or multi area agreement outcomes, including:
Reporting on Delivered Schemes
In determining the success of schemes delivered, a self-evaluation should be undertaken by developers and delivery partners of the quality of the development in accordance with principles established in the Shared Vision. This is the advice of both CABE and HCA-ATLAS which the toolkit supports.
Example: Plymouth Annual Monitoring Report 2008
Plymouth County Council is in the process of developing targets for the delivery of the cultural policies set out in their core strategy. Click here to access the AMR.



South London Gallery, Southwark
The gallery recently began expand into the derelict house next door in order to create a small-scale exhibition/project space and state-of-the-art education studio. The gallery will monitor visitor figures and participation in education projects before and after the expansion.
Stage 1a
Champion role
Stage 1b
Co-ordination
Stage 1c
Delivery role
Stage 2b
Visioning
Stage 3a
Needs
Stage 3c
Benchmarks
Stage 4c
Delivery priorities
© living places